Your Local Movie Theatre may be Owned by the Communist Party: Spell it-Communist Propaganda!

Posted on

Communist Red China is currently expanding their hypnotic propaganda network of influence throughout America using our own visual media companies.  From their perspective, this kind of psychological warfare makes perfect sense because they are acquiring movie production and distribution channels that make and spread visual imagery, potent psychological stimuli that sway the attitudes of the subconscious human mind.

Take for example, the document by Aaron Bandler about the question of “Has China Taken Over Hollywood?” at the Dailywire.com [February 17, 2017].  From my own work, The Hypnotic Communist, we already know that the Communist world has been very busy for years capturing a variety of our companies and institutions for the purpose of spreading Communism, but Bandler gives us more specifics about how this is now being accomplished.

Bandler says that it is the acquisition of American Multi-Cinema [AMC] that is allowing Communist China to vastly expand the hypnotic power of Communist propaganda movies thrust into the American culture.  According to Bandler, the Chinese Communist Party’s acquisition firm is named the Dalian Wanda Group which is owned by Wang Jianlin, a Communist agent picked by the Red Party specifically for this expansion of Communist influence on America. It is important to add that the Dalian Wanda Group is not really a business, but is only a united front organization that does the actual work of the Chinese Communist Party.  That way, the Party never gets exposed.

Bandler says that Jianlin has accomplished the following acquisitions:  AMC, which, in turn, acquired Carmike Cinemas; Legendary Entertainment, and Dick Clark Productions. The Communist Party is also planning to invest heavily in Paramount to the tune of one-billion dollars as well as working with Sony Corporation.  Bandler suggests that our new attorney general should intervene since our law prohibits the ownership of both  production and distribution companies due to conflicts of interest and monopoly concerns.  Unfortunately, the Communist Party cares nothing about American rule-of-law since it is the corruption and destruction of America that they seek. Communism is an extremely corrupting influence.

There is another relevant piece that clarifies the magnitude of the threat of Communist hypnotic propaganda on the American people.  Carrie Gracie’s October 13, 2017 essay at bbc.com entitled “The Thoughts of Chairman Xi,” provides a psychosocial profile of the ultimate individual behind this strategy to increase hypnotic control over American minds via the Hollywood film industry.  It is Xi Jinping, the Chairman of the Chinese Communist Party.  Communist countries do not have an elected president, only an appointed Communist Committee Chairman.

Gracie suggests that Jinping is trying to turn Americans against our own country by changing our patriotic American identity to the Communist Chinese identity.  Although Gracie does not mention the method of hypnotic induction possible through propaganda movies, she does thoroughly identify and explain what Jinping’s goals are for the world.

For example, Chairman Jinping, a notoriously devoted Communist, wants to eliminate any diversity of ideas or values characteristic of a free country according to Gracie.  She states that he seeks “absolute loyalty” of all Americans to the Communist Party’s way of thinking. He wants to eliminate any influences of American culture in videos and films to be replaced by Communist Chinese culture and values.  She suggests in this vein that the reason for this is that Communist dictatorships feel threatened by politically active citizenry.  Of course, patriotic American films encourage and reinforce increased political activism.  [The 2016 election of Mr. Donald Trump was an event the Communist world abhorred, no doubt.]

More specifically, Jinping has a specific program he calls “four identification,” according to Gracie. [Also notice that if you take-out the “u” in “four,” you have “for identification” indicating an additional Communist code that implies a plan to identify for future arrest anyone who doesn’t soak-up and exhibit the newly implanted Communist culture in the altered movies.]

The coded four identification program is apparently to be achieved by the replacement of the pro-American identity with the anti-American Chinese Communist identity by way of the concepts of:  The “Motherland,” “race,” the “socialist road,” and the “Chinese Dream”, i.e., world conquest, power, and Chinese domination, according to Gracie.  “Motherland” is the same love of land that Hitler once espoused as was the Communist concept of “race.” The “socialist road” refers to the desire to keep America on the road to becoming a full-blown Communist dictatorship and satellite of Red China.  And of course, the overall “Chinese Dream” is to make Red China replace America as the premier world power according to Gracie.  They believe this is only possible if America’s patriotic culture is destroyed and replaced by the foreign, anti-American, Asian Communist culture of complete submission to tyrannical authority.

Bandler suggests we should be on the lookout for more films with Chinese and Asian characters playing pro-Communist roles with their attendant anti-American themes.  And it wouldn’t hurt to contact Attorney General Sessions and demand an inquiry into China’s breaking of US law in these illegal acquisitions, as he aptly points out.

Would You Recognize the Difference Between Truth and Lies? Try This.

Posted on

A recent article by Alex Griswold at The Free Beacon caught my attention.  The reason it was catchy was its title: “Putin Apologist Oliver Stone’s Son Works for Russian Propaganda Network” at http://freebeacon.com/politics/putin-apologist-oliver-stones-son-works-russian-network/. You’ll have to admit the title shouts espionage and treason.  I have already called attention to the workings of Communist propaganda as the primary instrument of the weapons of Communist Hypnotics in my recent book, The Hypnotic Communist. Now, it seems, we have an easy to read example of just to what I referred.

If you recall, a Communist Agent was defined in my book as any human agent who has captured the public’s imagination and interest, preferably devotion, because of the powerful influence he has to change public opinions, attitudes, thoughts and beliefs.  These are people, for example, of the popular press, educators at all levels, not just universities; politicians, comedians, actors, government representatives, and so on.  It would be very difficult to identify all of these agents since most of them are not FSB (Communist) Agents proper, but can be identified by their varying levels of commitment, who are formally or informally, some consciously some unconsciously, working to push the communist agenda on the free world.

By their nature, their methods of slipping past the subconscious human mind are extremely deceptive.  For example, contrast the article noted above with one from the Communist hypnotic propaganda website https://www.rt.com/op-edge/392566-oliver-stone-putin-colbert-us/ by John Wight.  Griswold, who works for America’s The Free Beacon, disparages Oliver Stone’s son, Sean Stone, as a propagandist for V. Putin since he is literally employed by the Communist rag, RT.com.  In contrast, Moscow’s John Wight at RT.com commends Sean’s father, Oliver Stone, for his bravery in defending Vladimir Putin and accuses American for being “drunk on its own exceptionalism.” Which is the real Communist agent?  The answer is both since they both espouse the same Communist sympathy, each in a little different media, one video and the other written. Together, both expand the audience under the influence of Communist misinformation. Oliver Stone made the hypnotic propaganda show for his son’s employer, the head Communist Agent, Vladimir Putin! In turn, his son writes for Putin.

Would a typical reader have known the difference if he had read only the RT.com article?  Those who have already been hypnotically conditioned into the alternate world of Victimhood, would have probably sympathized with Moscow’s article over America’s.